ABSTRACT

When the declaration of intention for the dissolution of the contract of service is not clear, it is hard to interprete the situation. In such cases, the interpretation focuses on the behaviours instead of the declarations of both sides, especially the employer. And when the interpretation makes the intention for the dissolution clear, it must be accepted that the contract is ended at that moment. In this judgement analysis of the Supranational Court of Appeal, it can be concluded that; the interpretation of declarations or behaviours should protect the employee. If it is needed, the interpreter must interprete the situation for the employee. So that, the employee will benefit from the indemnities and other incomes of the dissolution