The citation format must conform with the APA styles. In case of doubt and for unspecified issues, the APA latest version and the editorial secretariat can be consulted.
In the Text Citation
References
The following files must be uploaded with the appropriate content and format when submitting an article.
2) Main Text File:
| What should be included in the main text file of a Turkish manuscript | What should be included in the main text file of an English manuscript |
| – Turkish title – Turkish essence – Turkish keywords – English title – English abstract – English keywords – English extented summary (Must appear before the references) | – English title – English abstract – English keywords – Turkish title – Turkish abstract – Turkish keywords – Turkish extented summary (Must appear before the references) |
3) Similarity file: The similarity file generated via “inlihal.net” or “turnitin.com” must be uploaded to the system.
4) Ethics Committee file: If “Ethics Committee Approval” is required due to ethical rules, the “Ethics Committee Approval Form” should be uploaded as a file. If such approval is not required, this file may not be uploaded.
Çalışma ve Toplum journal is a peer-reviewed scientific journal. A double-blind referee system is applied in the journal. Manuscripts submitted to the journal are firstly reviewed by the editor-in-chief and then by the field editors, with the author’s information concealed, in terms of compliance with the scope of the journal’s publication, scientific ethics, narrative and spelling rules. Authors of articles found inappropriate are notified by the editor-in-chief via e-mail.
The manuscripts deemed appropriate for the journal as a result of review by the field editors are submitted to the Editorial Board and sent separately to two referees who are recognised for their scientific studies in the field. The referees evaluate the manuscript on the basis of the article evaluation form and decide on one of the following results: “published without correction”, “published with correction” or “not suitable for publication”. Authors may be asked to make some corrections in their manuscripts in line with the referee reports. Referee reports are evaluated by the field editors and in case of doubt, options such as appointing a new referee and submitting the manuscript to the editorial board may be applied. Information regarding the decision of the Editorial Board and/or the editorial director and referee evaluations are sent to the author’s e-mail by the editor-in-chief.
All stages of the manuscript evaluation process are carried out by the editor-in-chief based on the confidentiality of the author and referees.
Peer-reviewers’ reports are kept in the journal archives for five years. For unspecified issues, please contact the journal secretariat.