It is possible to talk about a coal history of approximately two hundred years in the Zonguldak Mine Basin. How the first mining phenomenon emerged and who influenced the process was tried to be explained in the introduction section. In this section, it is stated that foreigners have a say in both management and production in the coal basin. On the other hand, efforts to be involved in coal production processes through the companies established by Turks have been witnessed. The official production history of coal, starting from 1848 until 1955, has been processed in accordance with chronology.
In coal mining, where injury and death rates are high, Zonguldak, known as the capital of labor in our country, has had a deep impact on the local people with hundreds of work accidents, large and small, and especially the firedamp explosion. When coal production and occupational accidents are compared between Turkey and developed countries, it is concluded that production and efficiency are low in the Zonguldak coal basins, but occupational accidents are more. In addition, while firedamp explosions decreased in developed countries, an increase was observed in Turkey.
During the Republican Period, a liberal economic model was adopted, and as a result of the unfavorable capital structure, a mixed economic model was preferred. This situation also manifested itself in mining. İn the region forced labor was introduced during World War II, but this practice was abandoned in 1947. Although some regulations were introduced regarding occupational safety during the Single Party Period, a comprehensive occupational safety law could not be enacted.
The hope that the expected legal regulations would be introduced in the mining sector after the Democratic Party came to power was gradually replaced by pessimism. As a matter of fact, the firedamp explosions that occurred two consecutive years in Zonguldak in 1954 and 1955 give clues about the need for legal regulations. A medium-scale firedamp explosion occurred in the same mine in 1954 and in 1947, but it turned out that the necessary precautions were not taken. Again, after the firedamp disaster in 1954, another major firedamp explosion occurred in 5 months in 1955, and very serious consequences were encountered. For the first time in the history of Zonguldak, politicians came to the scene of the incident, received information and pioneered the work.
Friendly states of the period sent messages of condolence due to the firedamp explosion in 1955, but the government welcomed the messages of condolence due to the disaster. However, the fact that John Lewis, the President of the American Mine Workers Union, recommended aid to Turkey in exchange for forming a commission in the USA and examining the mine that exploded with firedamp, disturbed the Turkish public opinion greatly. There was very serious criticism from the Turkish public, and it was as if the firedamp explosion was replaced by an avalanche of reactions. On the other hand, contrary to the reactions, it was evaluated that investigating the negligence in the firedamp explosion was vitally important and could be a turning point in taking precautions in future disasters. They summarized this as smoke coming out of a crooked chimney, pointing to John Lewis.
While the pain of the mining accident was fresh, judicial and administrative investigations were opened, and even the statements of all workers working in the mines were taken. It was decided to establish an administrative expert committee, consisting of people knowledgeable in their field. He announced that whoever was responsible for the firedamp explosion in the furnace would be revealed. However, while the judicial investigations were continuing, five engineers who were called to testify were arrested.
In the study, a scientific andLewis disciplined understanding has not been developed in solving chronic problems in the context of occupational safety.When two mining accident processes were examined, reflections of this situation were seen. The price of not taking the necessary measures in time had to be paid with the loss of many lives.
Again, in this study, those who lost their lives in mining accidents were defined as work martyrs. In the first stage, meetings were held with the miners’ relatives, but after it was too late, the local people, who had the mentality of what use it would be, did not show interest in these meetings. Contrary to politicians’ statements, financial aid was kept very low, and a process occurred in which those who lost their family members had to deal with economic problems. At a time when economic difficulties were felt in the region, workers who had to work in coal mines struggled not only with economic difficulties but also with psychological problems.